Working: 8:00 - 0:00 EST

Business-Blog

Introduction

In the world of network virtualization and data center networking, two solutions have gained attention: Cisco's Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) and VMware NSX-T. Both platforms offer features aimed at simplifying network operations, improving security, and enhancing scalability. However, they differ in terms of architecture and capabilities. This article aims to provide a comparison between Cisco ACI and VMware NSX-T to assist organizations in making decisions. At Zappsec, we provide both VMware and Cisco solutions, considering each as the "choice for scenarios." It is not uncommon for us to implement both NSX-T and Cisco ACI in the deployment when circumstances require it.

Overview of Cisco ACI and VMware NSX-T

Cisco ACI

Cisco ACI is a networking solution that automates application-related network configurations and security policies. It utilizes Software Defined Networking (SDN) technology while integrating seamlessly with hardware-based switches like the Nexus 9000 (N9K) series switches from Cisco.

VMware NSX-T

VMware NSX-T is a platform for network virtualization and security that enables the creation, deployment, and management of networks, across environments. NSX-T differs from ACI in that it is more focused on software than being tied to hardware. NSX-T utilizes GENEVE overlay network technology to establish isolated tenant broadcast domains.

When comparing the two systems there are areas to consider:

Architecture
Cisco ACI: Hardware and software-integrated, focused on both underlay and overlay networking. Implies purchasing a Nexus platform, and requires multiple Nexus appliances to facilitate the minimum-sized network with APIC and minimal spine and leaf switches.
VMware NSX-T: Software-only solution, relies on existing network hardware for underlay networking. Not limited to Cisco for the underlying hardware or underlay network.
Scalability and Performance
Cisco ACI: Often considered better for large-scale, performance-sensitive applications due to its hardware integration.
VMware NSX-T: Highly scalable but may require more computational resources for handling large traffic volumes.
Network Services and Functionality
Cisco ACI: Offers features like real-time health scores, Layer 4-7 service insertion, and multi-cloud support. One key difference here is that Cisco ACI is going to utilize VXLAN, which is older and in many ways inferior to NSX-T's overlay networking solution.
VMware NSX-T: Provides functionalities such as advanced micro-segmentation, load balancing, and VPN support. Utilizes GENEVE instead of VXLAN for the overlay network; see our article on GENEVE vs VXLAN.
Security
Cisco ACI: Security is enforced through application-centric policies and also supports micro-segmentation.
VMware NSX-T: Known for its robust micro-segmentation capabilities, enabling granular security policies.
Management and Operations
Cisco ACI: Managed through the APIC controller, offering centralized management but with a steeper learning curve.
VMware NSX-T: Easier to integrate with existing VMware environments, managed through a more user-friendly NSX Manager.
Cost
Cisco ACI: Higher initial cost due to hardware, but often results in lower operational expenses.
VMware NSX-T: Lower upfront cost but may incur additional expenses for scaling and specialized services.

Conclusion:

When deciding between Cisco ACI and VMware NSX-T, it ultimately comes down to your organization's requirements, existing infrastructure, and long-term plans for scalability. Both solutions offer features for network architecture but have different approaches when it comes to scalability, performance, and the vendor ecosystem. By considering these factors mentioned above, you can make a decision that aligns with your organizational goals.

At Zappsec, we specialize in providing our clients with engineers who are certified in both VMware and Cisco.

Share:

Lets Connect